Audit Trail · Article #2334020

À Québec, le caucus conservateur entend «brasser la cage» aux consensus

Source article ↗ · Le Devoir · outlet lean: center-left · owner: Le Devoir (independent co-op) (non_profit)

published 2026-10-14T04:00:00 · ingested 2026-10-14T10:52:11.196365

Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.

CENTER-LEFT score: -0.50 confidence: 80% vv3

The article presents a viewpoint that challenges established scientific consensus, which is generally seen as center-left in political discourse.

Trigger phrases: brasser la cageconsensus scientifiques ne sera pas requisec’est sain que les gens se posent des questions

      computed at 2026-10-14T11:02:58.319194
    

ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)

RIGHT score: 0.672 confidence: 96% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3

      computed at 2026-10-14T10:59:53.026876-04:00
    

Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)

RIGHT score: 0.672

Analysis Tier

Tier: quick_v1+full

Tier-1 at: 2026-10-14T11:02:58.319194

Tier-2 at: 2026-10-14T11:02:58.319194

AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-10-14T11:02:58.319194

Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.

Country: CA

Province: QC

Scope: provincial

Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)

unverified Les députés du Parti conservateur de la Colombie-Britannique sont indépendants et ne se limitent pas à accepter les conclusions scientifiques.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-14T11:03:04.220141
      

unverified La nouvelle élue conservatrice affirme que le consensus en matière de science n’est ni immuable ni une forme de dogmatisme.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-14T11:03:04.220141
      

unverified Le leader du Parti conservateur a déclaré qu’il y aurait un débat sur tout, indépendamment des idées politiques ou des préjugés.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-14T11:03:04.220141
      

Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.

À Québec, le caucus conservateur entend «brasser la cage» aux consensus 1 article across outlets

      clustered at 2026-10-14T10:52:11.207501
    

Governance — C.R.E.E.D.

A+

overall grade

100.0

By Category

Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked

Raw Audit Trail (2 events)

2026-10-14T10:52:11.196365 ingested

payload

{
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 592
}

2026-10-14T10:59:53.026876 bias_v2_scored

payload

{
  "confidence": 0.96,
  "ensemble_band": "right",
  "ensemble_score": 0.672,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.672
}

Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.