Audit Trail · Article #2346367

Did language dispute affect anglophone voters? Élections Québec plans survey

Source article ↗ · Montreal Gazette · outlet lean: center · owner: Postmedia (corporate)

published 2026-10-12T19:17:39 · ingested 2026-10-16T12:43:24.953890

Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.

CENTER score: 0.00 vv3

triggers: none — NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)

      computed at 2026-10-16T12:43:24.953890
    

ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)

RIGHT score: 0.310 confidence: 44% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3

      computed at 2026-10-16T12:46:44.845734-04:00
    

Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)

CENTER RIGHT score: 0.310

Analysis Tier

Tier: quick_v1

Tier-1 at: 2026-10-16T12:53:26.345903

Tier-2 at: —

AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-10-16T12:51:54.946106

Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.

Country: CA

Province: QC

Scope: provincial

Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (4)

unverified No verifiable claims detected.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-16T12:51:59.175378
      

unverified Élections Québec plans to survey whether language disputes affected anglophone and allophone voters.

        V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-16T12:53:26.256196
      

unverified Chief electoral officer Jean-François Blanchet warned the Quebec government that restrictions on English-language election information could discourage some anglophone and allophone voters from casting ballots.

        V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-16T12:53:26.256196
      

unverified While Montreal has vowed to tackle the homelessness crisis, it can’t solve it on its own.

        V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-16T12:53:26.256196
      

Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.

Did language dispute affect anglophone voters? Élections Québec plans survey 1 article across outlets

      clustered at 2026-10-16T12:43:24.956936
    

Governance — C.R.E.E.D.

A+

overall grade

100.0

By Category

Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked

Raw Audit Trail (2 events)

2026-10-16T12:43:24.953890 ingested

payload

{
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 594
}

2026-10-16T12:46:44.845734 bias_v2_scored

payload

{
  "confidence": 0.443,
  "ensemble_band": "center-right",
  "ensemble_score": 0.31,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.31
}

Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.