Audit Trail · Article #2364395

Lithium battery pilot planned for Fort Simpson is scrapped

Source article ↗ · Cabin Radio · outlet lean: center · owner: Cabin Radio Ltd (independent)

published 2026-10-19T11:52:00 · ingested 2026-10-19T09:54:55.169381

Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.

CENTER score: 0.00 vv3

triggers: none — NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)

      computed at 2026-10-19T09:54:55.169381
    

ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)

CENTER score: 0.000 confidence: 38% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3

      computed at 2026-10-19T10:24:53.550243-04:00
    

Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)

CENTER score: 0.000

Analysis Tier

Tier: quick_v1

Tier-1 at: 2026-10-19T10:39:43.890343

Tier-2 at: —

AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-10-19T10:39:43.890343

Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.

Country: CA

Province: NT

Scope: provincial

Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)

unverified An energy management pilot previously planned for Fort Simpson is no longer moving forward.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-19T10:39:51.650655
      

unverified The system would have hooked up large lithium batteries to the community’s existing diesel generators to charge those batteries throughout the day, allowing Fort Simpson to be essentially battery-powered at night.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-19T10:39:51.650655
      

unverified CleanDesign's project could save five to 20 percent of the energy the village consumes, depending on how they are used.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-19T10:39:51.650655
      

Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.

Lithium battery pilot planned for Fort Simpson is scrapped 1 article across outlets

      clustered at 2026-10-19T09:54:55.176401
    

Governance — C.R.E.E.D.

A+

overall grade

100.0

By Category

Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Fairness {'events': 1, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (1 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 1 events tracked

Raw Audit Trail (2 events)

2026-10-19T09:54:55.169381 ingested

payload

{
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 14335
}

2026-10-19T10:24:53.550243 bias_v2_scored

payload

{
  "confidence": 0.384,
  "ensemble_band": "center",
  "ensemble_score": 0.0,
  "label": "center",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.0
}

Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.