Audit Trail · Article #2375347
Quebec opposition parties want Parti Québécois to take note of Alberta referendum
Source article ↗
· Winnipeg Free Press
· outlet lean: center
· owner: FP Newspapers (independent local) (independent)
published 2026-10-20T16:03:05.768988
· ingested 2026-10-20T14:03:05.768988
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER
score: -0.20
confidence: 80%
vv3
The article highlights the position of opposition parties in Quebec regarding a referendum in Alberta, suggesting a left-leaning perspective on inter-provincial politics.
Trigger phrases:
Quebec opposition partiesParti Québécois
computed at 2026-10-20T14:19:16.422097
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT
score: 0.359
confidence: 51%
valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-10-20T14:19:59.517699-04:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER RIGHT
score: 0.359
Analysis Tier
Tier:
quick_v1
Tier-1 at:
2026-10-20T14:20:46.523002
Tier-2 at:
2026-10-20T14:19:16.422097
AI analyzed:
✓
at 2026-10-20T14:19:16.422097
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: QC
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (5)
unverified
Quebec opposition parties desire the Parti Québécois to acknowledge the outcome of the Alberta provincial election.
fact_v1 · 2026-10-20T14:19:23.119892
unverified
These opposition parties want the Parti Québécois to reflect on how decisions made in another province influenced their own region's future choices.
fact_v1 · 2026-10-20T14:19:23.119892
unverified
Quebec's opposition parties support the Parti Québécois in taking note of the Alberta referendum.
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-20T14:20:46.517392
unverified
The Parti Québécois has not yet taken a decision regarding the outcome of the Alberta referendum.
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-20T14:20:46.517392
unverified
The Quebec opposition parties hope to influence the Parti Québécois with the information from the Alberta referendum.
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-20T14:20:46.517392
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Quebec opposition parties want Parti Québécois to take note of Alberta referendum
2 articles across outlets
clustered at 2026-10-20T14:03:05.773539
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness
{'events': 1, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (1 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute
· 1 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
-
ingested
payload
{ "bias": { "band": "center", "heuristic_version": "v3", "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)", "score": 0.0, "signal_detected": false }, "source_id": 13761 } -
bias_v2_scored
payload
{ "confidence": 0.513, "ensemble_band": "center-right", "ensemble_score": 0.359, "label": "right", "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3", "score": 0.359 }
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the
transparency promise behind our methodology.