Audit Trail · Article #2376848

📈 Big plan, bigger ruling

Source article ↗ · iPolitics · outlet lean: center · owner: iPolitics Inc. (independent)

published 2026-10-20T20:57:25 · ingested 2026-10-20T17:27:58.004532

Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.

CENTER score: -0.20 confidence: 85% vv3

The article presents a balanced view without strong bias but leans towards a factual, information-focused tone.

Trigger phrases: economic insightsbig planbigger ruling

      computed at 2026-10-20T17:37:48.819230
    

ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)

RIGHT score: 0.287 confidence: 41% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3

      computed at 2026-10-20T17:53:52.836519-04:00
    

Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)

CENTER score: 0.043

Analysis Tier

Tier: quick_v1

Tier-1 at: 2026-10-20T17:39:13.625182

Tier-2 at: 2026-10-20T17:37:48.819230

AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-10-20T17:37:48.819230

Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.

Country: —

Province: —

Scope: unmappable

Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (5)

unverified The article is about economic insights.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-20T17:37:53.518822
      

unverified It welcomes readers back into the realm of economic discussions and analysis.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-20T17:37:53.518822
      

unverified There was a big plan and a bigger ruling mentioned in this article.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-20T17:37:53.518822
      

unverified The article discusses a big economic plan with potential for significant rulings.

        V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-20T17:39:13.618445
      

unverified This is the second post in an ongoing series on economic insights.

        V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-20T17:39:13.618445
      

Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.

📈 Big plan, bigger ruling 1 article across outlets

      clustered at 2026-10-20T17:27:58.013312
    

Governance — C.R.E.E.D.

A+

overall grade

100.0

By Category

Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked

Raw Audit Trail (2 events)

2026-10-20T17:27:58.004532 ingested

payload

{
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 489
}

2026-10-20T17:53:52.836519 bias_v2_scored

payload

{
  "confidence": 0.41,
  "ensemble_band": "center",
  "ensemble_score": 0.043,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.287
}

Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.