What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2379973

Défendre ses convictions sans perdre son humanité

Source article ↗ · Le Devoir · outlet lean: center-left · owner: Le Devoir (independent co-op) (non_profit)
published 2026-10-21T02:28:54.790409 · ingested 2026-10-21T00:28:54.790409
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER-LEFT score: -0.20 confidence: 80% vv3
The editorial suggests a form of compromise or reflection on the part of individuals, indicating a balanced but slightly critical stance.
Trigger phrases: why notlogique du convoi d’hier
computed at 2026-10-21T00:36:33.129005
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT score: 0.302 confidence: 43% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-10-21T00:36:36.734944-04:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER RIGHT score: 0.302
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1
Tier-1 at: 2026-10-21T00:39:40.447743
Tier-2 at: 2026-10-21T00:36:33.129005
AI analyzed: ✗
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: QC
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (5)
unverified Monsieur Éric Duhaime is questioning the application of logical principles from yesterday's protest to today's demonstrations.
fact_v1 · 2026-10-21T00:36:36.891104
unverified The individual inquires about applying a previous logic to current events, suggesting an analogy between past and present situations.
fact_v1 · 2026-10-21T00:36:36.891104
unverified 应用昨天卡车车队的逻辑到今天的抗议者身上
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-21T00:39:40.444888
unverified 质疑某些人的行为是否违反了人类的基本准则
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-21T00:39:40.444888
unverified 表达对某些特定群体的不认同
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-10-21T00:39:40.444888
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Défendre ses convictions sans perdre son humanité 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-10-21T00:28:54.803172
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 1, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (1 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 1 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload
    {
      "bias": {
        "band": "center",
        "heuristic_version": "v3",
        "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
        "score": 0.0,
        "signal_detected": false
      },
      "source_id": 592
    }
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload
    {
      "confidence": 0.432,
      "ensemble_band": "center-right",
      "ensemble_score": 0.302,
      "label": "right",
      "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
      "score": 0.302
    }
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.