Audit Trail · Article #2390060

Parliament Today: Bloc motion on streaming levies and cultural funding

Source article ↗ · The Hub · outlet lean: center-right · owner: The Hub Canada (independent)

published 2026-10-22T10:02:30 · ingested 2026-10-22T06:54:08.171182

Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.

CENTER-LEFT score: -0.20 vv3

The editorial focuses on the Bloc Québécois' motion, which highlights cultural funding and streaming levies, indicating a pro-Quebec stance.

Trigger phrases: Bloc Québécoiscultural sector plays a critical role in Quebec’s economy

      computed at 2026-10-22T06:54:08.171182
    

ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)

LEFT score: -0.307 confidence: 44% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3

      computed at 2026-10-22T07:09:15.536819-04:00
    

Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)

CENTER LEFT score: -0.307

Analysis Tier

Tier: quick_v1+full

Tier-1 at: 2026-10-22T07:09:01.238392

Tier-2 at: 2026-11-03T04:15:38.662527

AI analyzed: ✗

Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.

Country: —

Province: —

Scope: unmappable

Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (2)

true The Bloc Québécois motion asks the government to uphold CRTC streaming levies and release an interim payment of $600 million.

The article provides clear details about the motion's content.

        T.A.L.O.N. · 2026-11-03T04:15:38.662527
      

mixed Culture is central to Quebec’s identity and the cultural sector faces serious pressures.

While these statements are factual, they are also part of the Bloc Québécois' argument, which may be seen as advocacy.

        T.A.L.O.N. · 2026-11-03T04:15:38.662527
      

Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.

Parliament Today: Bloc motion on streaming levies and cultural funding 1 article across outlets

      clustered at 2026-10-22T06:54:08.176158
    

Governance — C.R.E.E.D.

A+

overall grade

100.0

By Category

Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked

Raw Audit Trail (2 events)

2026-10-22T06:54:08.171182 ingested

payload

{
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 14347
}

2026-10-22T07:09:15.536819 bias_v2_scored

payload

{
  "confidence": 0.439,
  "ensemble_band": "center-left",
  "ensemble_score": -0.307,
  "label": "left",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": -0.307
}

Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.