Audit Trail · Article #2391529
Pas de projet de coupes malgré l’abolition du ministère du Tourisme
Source article ↗
· Le Devoir
· outlet lean: center-left
· owner: Le Devoir (independent co-op) (non_profit)
published 2026-10-22T16:48:27.909859
· ingested 2026-10-22T12:48:27.909859
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER-RIGHT
score: 0.10
confidence: 80%
vv3
The article provides a neutral stance on the government's decision but leans slightly towards supporting the government’s perspective by explaining that the integration of ministries aims for efficiency rather than cost-cutting.
Trigger phrases:
ministère de l’Économieplus grande efficacité
computed at 2026-10-22T12:59:33.023660
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT
score: 0.285
confidence: 41%
valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-10-22T13:00:18.232175-04:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER RIGHT
score: 0.285
Analysis Tier
Tier:
quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at:
2026-10-22T13:01:59.621877
Tier-2 at:
2026-11-02T22:15:55.167407
AI analyzed:
✓
at 2026-10-22T12:59:33.023660
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: QC
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (2)
true
The abolition of the Tourism Ministry and its integration into the Economy Ministry aims for greater efficiency.
The article quotes a PQ spokesperson who stated that the goal is to simplify processes rather than cut jobs.
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-11-02T22:15:55.167407
true
No immediate job cuts are planned despite the ministry's abolition.
The government official explicitly stated there would be no significant job reductions in this context.
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-11-02T22:15:55.167407
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
L’abolition du ministère du Tourisme au Québec inquiète l’industrie
2 articles across outlets
clustered at 2026-10-22T12:06:53.502038
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness
{'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute
· 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
-
ingested
payload
{ "bias": { "band": "center", "heuristic_version": "v3", "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)", "score": 0.0, "signal_detected": false }, "source_id": 592 } -
bias_v2_scored
payload
{ "confidence": 0.407, "ensemble_band": "center-right", "ensemble_score": 0.285, "label": "right", "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3", "score": 0.285 }
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the
transparency promise behind our methodology.