What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2391530

Coup de chapeau à l’eau de Québec

Source article ↗ · Le Devoir · outlet lean: center-left · owner: Le Devoir (independent co-op) (non_profit)
published 2026-10-22T16:21:41 · ingested 2026-10-22T12:48:28.008089
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER score: 0.20 confidence: 85% vv3
The article is from a reputable Canadian newspaper and focuses on factual reporting without evident bias.
Trigger phrases: reputable Canadian newspaperfactual reporting
computed at 2026-10-22T12:59:22.828858
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT score: 0.281 confidence: 40% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-10-22T13:00:10.536779-04:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER RIGHT score: 0.281
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-10-22T13:01:50.759756
Tier-2 at: 2026-11-02T23:05:43.263077
AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-10-22T12:59:22.828858
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: QC
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)
true La station de Sainte-Foy a récolté mercredi la palme du Concours de la meilleure eau du Québec.
The claim is supported by the article and verified through the Concours de la meilleure eau du Québec.
V.E.T. · 2026-11-02T23:05:43.263077
mixed La ville à l’accent d’Amérique détrône ainsi Saint-Eustache, récipiendaire de la palme en 2025.
While the claim is factual regarding the station of Sainte-Foy being the winner, it inaccurately states that Saint-Eustache was the recipient in 2025.
V.E.T. · 2026-11-02T23:05:43.263077
true Les robinets de la capitale québécoise versent la meilleure eau du Québec.
The claim is directly supported by the article stating that Sainte-Foy station won the competition.
V.E.T. · 2026-11-02T23:05:43.263077
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Coup de chapeau à l’eau de Québec 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-10-22T12:48:28.016227
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 592
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.402,
  "ensemble_band": "center-right",
  "ensemble_score": 0.281,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.281
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.