What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2396592

Three Rivers council calls for action on crime prevention report

Source article ↗ · SaltWire Network · outlet lean: center · owner: Postmedia (ex-SaltWire, 2024) (corporate)
published 2026-10-23T11:46:10 · ingested 2026-10-23T07:49:38.245960
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER score: -0.10 confidence: 85% vv3
The article focuses on the local government's response to a crime prevention report, which is typically seen as a neutral stance.
Trigger phrases: Three Rivers councilcrime prevention report
computed at 2026-10-23T07:49:38.245960
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT score: 0.270 confidence: 39% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-10-23T07:53:01.134564-04:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER RIGHT score: 0.270
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-10-23T07:53:36.908782
Tier-2 at: 2026-11-01T03:41:21.320026
AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-10-23T07:52:46.529102
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: NS
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (2)
true Three Rivers council has voted unanimously to make five recommendations from a new crime prevention report a priority for the next council.
The article directly states this and provides context without contradicting evidence.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-11-01T03:41:21.320026
true The decision came after Chris Giacomantonio, director of the Clairmont Centre for Community Safety Research, presented a crime prevention needs assessment to council on Oct. 13.
Details provided in the article about the presenter and date align with the claim.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-11-01T03:41:21.320026
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Three Rivers council calls for action on crime prevention report 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-10-23T07:49:38.251795
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 13771
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.386,
  "ensemble_band": "center-right",
  "ensemble_score": 0.27,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.27
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.