What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2410335

Comment David Eby a perdu son pari en Colombie-Britannique

Source article ↗ · Le Devoir · outlet lean: center-left · owner: Le Devoir (independent co-op) (non_profit)
published 2026-10-25T20:54:00 · ingested 2026-10-25T17:42:50.914315
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
LEFT score: -0.40 confidence: 85% vv3
The article focuses on the unexpected victory of the conservative party and criticizes the NDP's decision to call early elections, which is seen as a strategic misstep.
Trigger phrases: error monumentalestrategic misstep
computed at 2026-10-25T17:42:50.914315
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT score: 0.507 confidence: 72% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-10-25T17:45:13.436081-04:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER RIGHT score: 0.507
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-10-25T17:45:28.119086
Tier-2 at: 2026-10-31T07:49:46.018279
AI analyzed: ✗
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: QC
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)
true The conservative party won the election or leads in most constituencies, marking an almost unthinkable result given previous outcomes.
This is a factual statement based on the reported results of the election.
E.C.H.O. · 2026-10-31T07:49:46.018279
true David Eby called for early elections hoping to strengthen his party's mandate but instead lost control of the government.
The article details that Eby called for an early election in September, and the results show he lost his majority.
E.C.H.O. · 2026-10-31T07:49:46.018279
true Experts criticize David Eby's decision to call for early elections as a strategic error with major consequences.
Both experts quoted in the article provide similar criticisms of Eby’s decision-making regarding the election timing.
E.C.H.O. · 2026-10-31T07:49:46.018279
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Comment David Eby a perdu son pari en Colombie-Britannique 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-10-25T17:42:50.925070
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload
    {
      "bias": {
        "band": "center",
        "heuristic_version": "v3",
        "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
        "score": 0.0,
        "signal_detected": false
      },
      "source_id": 592
    }
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload
    {
      "confidence": 0.725,
      "ensemble_band": "center-right",
      "ensemble_score": 0.507,
      "label": "right",
      "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
      "score": 0.507
    }
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.