What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2413719

DND refuses to say if it received secret F-35 report from U.S.

Source article ↗ · Ottawa Citizen · outlet lean: center · owner: Postmedia (corporate)
published 2026-10-26T12:00:01 · ingested 2026-10-26T08:11:23.297817
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER-LEFT score: -0.50 vv3
The article presents a balanced view by providing information from both Canadian and U.S. perspectives without clearly favoring one side.
Trigger phrases: refuses to saysecret F-35 reporthighly critical of the F-35 program
computed at 2026-10-26T08:11:23.297817
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT score: 0.365 confidence: 52% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-10-26T08:21:52.328766-04:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER RIGHT score: 0.365
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-10-26T08:26:03.536948
Tier-2 at: 2026-10-26T09:14:26.514985
AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-10-26T08:26:03.536948
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: US
Province: —
Scope: international
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)
true The Department of National Defence has refused to answer questions about whether they received a recent U.S. government audit on the F-35.
This is directly stated in the article.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-10-26T09:14:26.514985
true Previous GAO reports have been critical of the F-35 program, highlighting issues such as spare parts and technical problems.
The article cites previous reports from the GAO that were critical of the F-35.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-10-26T09:14:26.514985
true The Pentagon blocked a July report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the production and modernization of the F-35 from public release.
The article explicitly states that the GAO's latest report was barred from public release.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-10-26T09:14:26.514985
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
DND refuses to say if it received secret F-35 report from U.S. 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-10-26T08:11:23.318044
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 595
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.521,
  "ensemble_band": "center-right",
  "ensemble_score": 0.365,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.365
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.