What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2439362

Victoire en Cour en faveur de la vidéodescription pour les personnes avec un handicap visuel

Source article ↗ · Le Devoir · outlet lean: center-left · owner: Le Devoir (independent co-op) (non_profit)
published 2026-10-29T16:10:07 · ingested 2026-10-29T12:29:44.472142
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER-LEFT score: -0.20 confidence: 80% vv3
The article advocates for accessibility and equality, which leans left-of-center in its perspective.
Trigger phrases: victoire en faveur de la vidéodescriptionjugement rendu
computed at 2026-10-29T12:29:44.472142
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT score: 0.249 confidence: 36% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-10-29T15:37:40.115061-04:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER score: 0.249
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-10-29T13:43:50.672675
Tier-2 at: 2026-10-30T02:30:54.912954
AI analyzed: ✗
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: QC
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)
true Le Tribunal canadien des droits de la personne a jugé discriminatoire l’offre de service de vidéo sur demande de Cogeco.
The article directly states this claim and provides supporting details.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-10-30T02:30:54.912954
true La décision pourrait toucher de nombreux Canadiens car la population vieillit et le nombre de personnes ayant des problèmes de vision augmente.
This is a logical inference based on demographic trends mentioned in the article.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-10-30T02:30:54.912954
true La vidéodescription permet aux personnes ayant une déficience visuelle de participer pleinement à la vie de notre société.
The decision explicitly mentions this point as a key benefit of videodescription.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-10-30T02:30:54.912954
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Victoire en Cour en faveur de la vidéodescription pour les personnes avec un handicap visuel 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-10-29T12:29:44.480239
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 592
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.355,
  "ensemble_band": "center",
  "ensemble_score": 0.249,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.249
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.