Audit Trail · Article #2441339

$9-million CTrain station safety pilot brought 'material changes', argues councillor who championed it

Source article ↗ · Calgary Herald · outlet lean: center-right · owner: Postmedia (corporate)

published 2026-10-29T20:53:31 · ingested 2026-10-29T17:00:11.797267

Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.

CENTER score: -0.20 confidence: 80% vv3

The article presents a balanced view, but leans slightly negative by highlighting that most Calgarians still feel safety has worsened despite the pilot project.

Trigger phrases: most noticed increased securitybut felt safety still worsened at CTrain stations

      computed at 2026-10-29T17:57:35.071395
    

ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)

RIGHT score: 0.311 confidence: 44% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3

      computed at 2026-10-29T17:03:32.510727-04:00
    

Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)

CENTER RIGHT score: 0.311

Analysis Tier

Tier: quick_v1+full

Tier-1 at: 2026-10-29T17:57:35.071395

Tier-2 at: 2026-10-29T17:57:35.071395

AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-10-29T17:57:35.071395

Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.

Country: CA

Province: AB

Scope: provincial

Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (2)

unverified A $9-million CTrain station safety pilot in Calgary improved perceptions of safety among passengers.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-29T17:57:35.150704
      

unverified The majority of Calgarians still perceive that the safety of public transit has either stagnated or worsened over the past year.

        fact_v1 · 2026-10-29T17:57:35.150704
      

Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.

$9-million CTrain station safety pilot brought 'material changes', argues councillor who championed it 1 article across outlets

      clustered at 2026-10-29T17:00:11.818272
    

Governance — C.R.E.E.D.

A+

overall grade

100.0

By Category

Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked

Raw Audit Trail (2 events)

2026-10-29T17:00:11.797267 ingested

payload

{
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 13757
}

2026-10-29T17:03:32.510727 bias_v2_scored

payload

{
  "confidence": 0.444,
  "ensemble_band": "center-right",
  "ensemble_score": 0.311,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.311
}

Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.