What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2447272

Dormant site of cancelled Downtown high-rise listed at $4 million

Source article ↗ · Edmonton Journal · outlet lean: center-right · owner: Postmedia (corporate)
published 2026-10-30T11:07:29 · ingested 2026-10-30T07:29:45.032688
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER-LEFT score: -0.20 confidence: 80% vv3
The article presents a neutral stance without obvious bias, but includes quotes that suggest disappointment in the project’s cancellation.
Trigger phrases: 'It's a fantastic site and a fantastic community, and it'd be great to see someone develop''There were obviously some challenges'
computed at 2026-10-30T07:29:45.032688
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
LEFT score: -0.240 confidence: 34% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-10-30T08:12:15.528261-04:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER LEFT score: -0.240
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-10-30T10:27:34.818148
Tier-2 at: 2026-10-30T11:18:12.913408
AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-10-30T10:27:34.818148
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: AB
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)
true The land is listed at $4 million.
The article explicitly states that the lot was listed for $4 million by JLL.
T.A.L.O.N. · 2026-10-30T11:18:12.913408
true The site had plans for a 22-storey apartment complex with around 185 units, underground parking and retail on the main floor.
The article provides details about the original project's specifications.
T.A.L.O.N. · 2026-10-30T11:18:12.913408
mixed Construction started five years ago but was ultimately cancelled after delays.
While the article states the construction started and was cancelled, it does not provide specific dates or reasons for cancellation beyond mentioning challenges and a contractor abandoning the site.
T.A.L.O.N. · 2026-10-30T11:18:12.913408
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Dormant site of cancelled Downtown high-rise listed at $4 million 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-10-30T07:29:45.040001
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 13758
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.342,
  "ensemble_band": "center-left",
  "ensemble_score": -0.24,
  "label": "left",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": -0.24
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.