What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2471852

Un référendum sur Trump

Source article ↗ · Le Devoir · outlet lean: center-left · owner: Le Devoir (independent co-op) (non_profit)
published 2026-11-02T05:00:00 · ingested 2026-11-02T00:13:56.391465
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
LEFT score: -0.80 confidence: 95% vv3
The article criticizes Donald Trump and the Republican Party, highlighting their actions as 'idiots and crimes', while praising the Democratic Party for its 'timid' response to his presidency.
Trigger phrases: solipsiste emprisonnéattaque contre l’Iranenrichissement massif de lui-même et de sa familleréponse aux deux attaques non provoquées
computed at 2026-11-02T00:13:56.391465
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT score: 0.540 confidence: 77% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-11-02T00:59:19.916382-05:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER RIGHT score: 0.540
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-11-02T01:02:56.927819
Tier-2 at: 2026-11-02T01:52:08.746430
AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-11-02T01:01:21.697799
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: US
Province: —
Scope: international
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)
true Donald Trump is not a president like the others and has been actively involved in campaigning during midterms.
The author directly states that Trump's behavior differs from other presidents and mentions his active campaigning.
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-11-02T01:52:08.746430
true The upcoming election will be seen as a referendum on Donald Trump by the electorate.
The author explicitly states, 'Si le scrutin est perçu purement comme un référendum sur Trump par l’électorat,'
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-11-02T01:52:08.746430
true The Democratic Party has been weak in opposing the Trump administration's policies.
The article criticizes the Democratic leadership for their 'timid' response to Trump's actions.
V.E.R.I.F.Y. · 2026-11-02T01:52:08.746430
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Un référendum sur Trump 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-11-02T00:13:56.398666
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 592
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.772,
  "ensemble_band": "center-right",
  "ensemble_score": 0.54,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.54
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.