Audit Trail · Article #2476423

Pourquoi deux Dan Sullivan se retrouvent-ils sur le bulletin de vote en Alaska?

Source article ↗ · Le Devoir · outlet lean: center-left · owner: Le Devoir (independent co-op) (non_profit)

published 2026-11-02T16:20:08 · ingested 2026-11-02T11:53:36.512220

Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.

LEFT score: -0.50 confidence: 85% vv3

The article focuses on a strategy employed by the Democratic Party to manipulate voter ballots, which is typically seen as left-leaning criticism.

Trigger phrases: stratégie de brouillage des votesmanipuler la composition du bulletin de vote

      computed at 2026-11-02T12:19:54.268780
    

ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)

RIGHT score: 0.436 confidence: 62% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3

      computed at 2026-11-02T12:19:32.270216-05:00
    

Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)

CENTER RIGHT score: 0.436

Analysis Tier

Tier: quick_v1+full

Tier-1 at: 2026-11-02T12:19:54.268780

Tier-2 at: 2026-11-02T12:19:54.268780

AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-11-02T12:19:54.268780

Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.

Country: CA

Province: QC

Scope: provincial

Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)

unverified Cette course inusitée pourrait influencer le contrôle du Sénat

        fact_v1 · 2026-11-02T12:19:54.564516
      

unverified Le résultat de cette course s'avère déterminant pour la direction du pays

        fact_v1 · 2026-11-02T12:19:54.564516
      

unverified La course est particulièrement remarquable, rendant son impact encore plus significatif

        fact_v1 · 2026-11-02T12:19:54.564516
      

Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.

Pourquoi deux Dan Sullivan se retrouvent-ils sur le bulletin de vote en Alaska? 1 article across outlets

      clustered at 2026-11-02T11:53:36.528061
    

Governance — C.R.E.E.D.

A+

overall grade

100.0

By Category

Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}

Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked

Raw Audit Trail (2 events)

2026-11-02T11:53:36.512220 ingested

payload

{
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 592
}

2026-11-02T12:19:32.270216 bias_v2_scored

payload

{
  "confidence": 0.623,
  "ensemble_band": "center-right",
  "ensemble_score": 0.436,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.436
}

Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.