What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2478234

Why advocates want Nova Scotia to change its non-disclosure agreement rules

Source article ↗ · SaltWire Network · outlet lean: center · owner: Postmedia (ex-SaltWire, 2024) (corporate)
published 2026-11-02T20:32:31 · ingested 2026-11-02T15:53:44.109375
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
LEFT score: -0.40 vv3
The article leans towards the perspective of advocates who want to change non-disclosure agreement rules, presenting their arguments in detail.
Trigger phrases: advocates saywait advocates say comes with serious consequences for survivors
computed at 2026-11-02T16:19:04.273839
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT score: 0.255 confidence: 36% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-11-02T16:16:09.079969-05:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER score: -0.073
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-11-02T16:19:04.273839
Tier-2 at: 2026-11-02T16:19:04.273839
AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-11-02T16:19:04.273839
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: NS
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (2)
unverified Advocates argue that non-disclosure agreements prevent survivors from speaking up.
fact_v1 · 2026-11-02T16:19:04.472772
unverified Nova Scotia's government supports a national approach to improving non-disclosure agreement rules.
fact_v1 · 2026-11-02T16:19:04.472772
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Why advocates want Nova Scotia to change its non-disclosure agreement rules 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-11-02T15:53:44.116780
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "left",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: advocates say(-0.10\u00d71)",
    "score": -1.0,
    "signal_detected": true
  },
  "source_id": 13771
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.365,
  "ensemble_band": "center",
  "ensemble_score": -0.073,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.255
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.