What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2485006

Inuvik endorses Tesla plan to build Supercharger in town

Source article ↗ · Cabin Radio · outlet lean: center · owner: Cabin Radio Ltd (independent)
published 2026-11-03T11:59:00 · ingested 2026-11-03T07:23:49.152059
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER score: 0.00 vv3
The article presents factual information without overt bias, focusing on the logistics and potential benefits of the Tesla Supercharger installation.
Trigger phrases: approved staff entering an agreementtown council has approvedcould also improve visitor services
computed at 2026-11-03T07:23:49.152059
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
CENTER score: 0.000 confidence: 39% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-11-03T08:49:11.826520-05:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER score: 0.000
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-11-03T08:07:48.502447
Tier-2 at: 2026-11-03T09:40:43.094264
AI analyzed: ✗
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: NT
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)
true Inuvik's town council has approved a plan for Tesla to build a Supercharger in front of the Midnight Sun Complex.
The article provides clear details on the agreement and includes quotes from official documents.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-11-03T09:40:43.094264
true The station could improve visitor services, support electric vehicle tourism, and promote Inuvik as a northern destination with fast-charging services.
These benefits are directly stated in the council's documents and align with common arguments for such infrastructure.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-11-03T09:40:43.094264
true Tesla would cover installation and operating costs, while Inuvik is responsible for snow removal and Tesla pays $200 a month for site use.
The article details the financial aspects of the agreement in clear terms.
P.R.O.O.F. · 2026-11-03T09:40:43.094264
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Inuvik endorses Tesla plan to build Supercharger in town 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-11-03T07:23:49.164170
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 14335
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.386,
  "ensemble_band": "center",
  "ensemble_score": 0.0,
  "label": "center",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.0
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.