What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2487552

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith defends new 91-seat electoral map

Source article ↗ · Edmonton Journal · outlet lean: center-right · owner: Postmedia (corporate)
published 2026-11-03T18:42:02 · ingested 2026-11-03T13:53:38.589386
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER-LEFT score: -0.50 confidence: 80% vv3
The article includes statements from the opposition leader criticizing the UCP government's actions, suggesting a bias against the current ruling party.
Trigger phrases: opposition’s promise to pursue legal challengesTrump-style MAGA gerrymandered mapcheat to win
computed at 2026-11-03T13:53:38.589386
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
LEFT score: -0.349 confidence: 50% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-11-03T14:00:27.330341-05:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
LEFT score: -0.674
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-11-03T14:07:10.874599
Tier-2 at: 2026-11-03T14:42:20.173321
AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-11-03T14:07:10.874599
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: AB
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (2)
true Premier Danielle Smith says she’ll be putting together a legal team to defend Alberta's proposed new electoral boundaries.
The article directly quotes the premier making this statement.
A.X.I.O.M. · 2026-11-03T14:42:20.173321
true Alberta NDP leader Naheed Nenshi intends to challenge the constitutionality of the map in court if passed.
The article includes a direct quote from Naheed Nenshi stating his intentions.
A.X.I.O.M. · 2026-11-03T14:42:20.173321
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Alberta Premier Smith defends proposed riding redraw that Opposition calls cheating 4 articles across outlets
clustered at 2026-11-03T11:53:38.835237
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "left",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: ndp(-0.60\u00d71)",
    "score": -1.0,
    "signal_detected": true
  },
  "source_id": 13758
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.498,
  "ensemble_band": "left",
  "ensemble_score": -0.674,
  "label": "left",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": -0.349
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.