What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2488127

Interactive maps: See the changes from Alberta's new electoral boundaries

Source article ↗ · Edmonton Journal · outlet lean: center-right · owner: Postmedia (corporate)
published 2026-11-03T20:17:01 · ingested 2026-11-03T15:23:42.089772
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER-LEFT score: -0.40 confidence: 80% vv3
The article presents a critical view of the electoral map changes, highlighting potential gerrymandering and concerns from political parties.
Trigger phrases: American-style gerrymanderingOpposition New Democrats (NDP) claim tilt the playing fieldconsidering litigation
computed at 2026-11-03T15:23:42.089772
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT score: 0.338 confidence: 48% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-11-03T15:40:28.125508-05:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER RIGHT score: 0.338
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-11-03T15:39:05.570817
Tier-2 at: 2026-11-03T16:40:19.946527
AI analyzed: ✗
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: AB
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)
true Alberta’s new electoral map was unveiled on Monday amid accusations of American-style gerrymandering.
The article directly states the accusation and provides context around it.
A.X.I.O.M. · 2026-11-03T16:40:19.946527
true The government rejected previously proposed 89-seat boundaries and commissioned a new process resulting in the current 91-seat map.
This information is explicitly stated in the article as part of the electoral boundary changes timeline.
A.X.I.O.M. · 2026-11-03T16:40:19.946527
mixed Elections Alberta warned it may struggle to run the next provincial election based on the new boundaries, but the government says it will be ready for the Oct. 18, 2027 vote.
The article presents both sides of the argument: concerns from Elections Alberta and confidence from the government.
A.X.I.O.M. · 2026-11-03T16:40:19.946527
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Interactive maps: See the changes from Alberta's new electoral boundaries 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-11-03T15:23:42.097835
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 13758
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.482,
  "ensemble_band": "center-right",
  "ensemble_score": 0.338,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.338
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.