What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2489106

Le syndicat des policiers contestera la décision du SPVM de congédier 7 policiers

Source article ↗ · Le Devoir · outlet lean: center-left · owner: Le Devoir (independent co-op) (non_profit)
published 2026-11-03T22:19:28 · ingested 2026-11-03T17:53:38.517700
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
CENTER score: -0.20 confidence: 85% vv3
The article provides a balanced view without明显地偏向任何一方。
Trigger phrases: congédierdéfendre des principespremier dans l'histoire
computed at 2026-11-03T18:51:32.362117
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
CENTER score: 0.000 confidence: 37% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-11-03T18:45:13.972064-05:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER score: 0.000
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-11-03T18:51:32.362117
Tier-2 at: 2026-11-03T18:51:32.362117
AI analyzed: ✓ at 2026-11-03T18:51:32.362117
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: QC
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)
unverified Le syndicat des policiers contestera la décision du SPVM de congédier 7 policiers.
fact_v1 · 2026-11-03T18:51:32.453781
unverified La Fraternité des policiers et policières de Montréal souhaite défendre « des principes ».
fact_v1 · 2026-11-03T18:51:32.453781
unverified La décision du SPVM d'administrativement congéder sept policiers est contestée par le syndicat pourra faire suite à une déclaration signée par Yves Francoeur, président de la Fraternité des policiers et policières de Montréal.
fact_v1 · 2026-11-03T18:51:32.453781
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
Le syndicat des policiers contestera la décision du SPVM de congédier 7 policiers 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-11-03T17:53:38.528970
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 592
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.371,
  "ensemble_band": "center",
  "ensemble_score": 0.0,
  "label": "center",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.0
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.