What The Fact · Tech
Home Dashboard Transparency API ← Consumer site
Audit Trail · Article #2489557

NWT’s Scan law ‘may not be very effective at doing much of anything’

Source article ↗ · Cabin Radio · outlet lean: center · owner: Cabin Radio Ltd (independent)
published 2026-11-03T23:32:21 · ingested 2026-11-03T18:53:48.120299
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
LEFT score: -0.40 confidence: 90% vv3
The article presents a critical perspective on the law, focusing on concerns from one MLA.
Trigger phrases: 'may not be very effective'not universalone MLA's concerns
computed at 2026-11-03T18:56:02.513896
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT score: 0.265 confidence: 38% valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-11-03T19:44:39.978208-05:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER score: -0.068
Analysis Tier
Tier: quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at: 2026-11-03T18:57:47.853771
Tier-2 at: 2026-11-03T19:20:08.666029
AI analyzed: ✗
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: NT
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (2)
true Many MLAs are fans of the NWT's forthcoming Safer Communities and Neighbourhoods law, but that praise is not universal.
The statement reflects a mix of support and skepticism, which is consistent with the article's content.
A.X.I.O.M. · 2026-11-03T19:20:08.666029
true One MLA's concerns are highlighted in this review.
This claim aligns with the article’s focus on presenting one MLA's perspective.
A.X.I.O.M. · 2026-11-03T19:20:08.666029
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
NWT’s Scan law ‘may not be very effective at doing much of anything’ 1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-11-03T18:53:48.129405
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness {'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency {'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute · 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
  1. ingested
    payload 
    {
  "bias": {
    "band": "center",
    "heuristic_version": "v3",
    "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)",
    "score": 0.0,
    "signal_detected": false
  },
  "source_id": 14335
}
  2. bias_v2_scored
    payload 
    {
  "confidence": 0.378,
  "ensemble_band": "center",
  "ensemble_score": -0.068,
  "label": "right",
  "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3",
  "score": 0.265
}
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the transparency promise behind our methodology.