Audit Trail · Article #2492294
La saison des non
Source article ↗
· L'actualité
· outlet lean: center-left
· owner: Mishmash Media (independent)
published 2026-11-04T06:00:00
· ingested 2026-11-04T01:53:41.228245
Bias Analysis · B.I.A.S.
LEFT
score: -0.40
vv3
The article presents a critical view on separatist movements and their perceived unpopularity, suggesting a shift towards a more pragmatic approach.
Trigger phrases:
refus d’une majorité écrasanteréponse tièdeaffrontements constitutionnels
computed at 2026-11-04T01:53:41.228245
ML Bias Signal · DistilBERT Zero-Shot (v2)
RIGHT
score: 0.292
confidence: 42%
valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3
computed at 2026-11-04T02:51:16.884849-05:00
Ensemble (heuristic + ML v2)
CENTER RIGHT
score: 0.292
Analysis Tier
Tier:
quick_v1+full
Tier-1 at:
2026-11-04T02:55:10.571878
Tier-2 at:
2026-11-04T03:28:47.925639
AI analyzed:
✓
at 2026-11-04T02:53:18.532733
Geographic Extraction · L.O.C.A.L.
Country: CA
Province: ON
Scope: provincial
Fact-Check Claims · V.E.R.I.F.Y. (3)
true
A majority of voters in both Quebec and Alberta rejected the idea of launching a referendum process.
The article cites polling data and election results showing strong opposition to separatist movements.
V.E.T. · 2026-11-04T03:28:47.925639
true
The recent vote in Alberta did not have any elected officials supporting it.
The article explicitly states this fact, citing the absence of support from elected officials.
V.E.T. · 2026-11-04T03:28:47.925639
mixed
There is a shift towards pragmatism over separatist aspirations in both regions.
While the article highlights a pragmatic approach, it does not provide clear evidence that this shift is universally accepted or ongoing.
V.E.T. · 2026-11-04T03:28:47.925639
Cross-Outlet Cluster · I.N.K.
La saison des non
1 article across outlets
clustered at 2026-11-04T01:53:41.236205
Governance — C.R.E.E.D.
A+
overall grade
100.0
By Category
Accountability
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Environmental
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Fairness
{'events': 3, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'below minimum volume (3 events; minimum 100 for a non-provisional score)', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Privacy
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Safety
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Transparency
{'events': 0, 'grade': 'A+', 'note': 'no events recorded', 'provisional': True, 'score': 100.0}
Ethics audit by C.R.E.E.D. Institute
· 3 events tracked
Raw Audit Trail (2 events)
-
ingested
payload
{ "bias": { "band": "center", "heuristic_version": "v3", "rationale": "triggers: none \u2014 NO SIGNAL DETECTED (not a centrist finding)", "score": 0.0, "signal_detected": false }, "source_id": 13766 } -
bias_v2_scored
payload
{ "confidence": 0.417, "ensemble_band": "center-right", "ensemble_score": 0.292, "label": "right", "model": "valhalla/distilbart-mnli-12-3", "score": 0.292 }
Every signal computed about this article, with timestamps. Source for the
transparency promise behind our methodology.